Author summary
13%7 analyzed articles/videos4,513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Casey results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,418 hits. Analysis detected 11,997 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,545 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,315 of 6,530 authors). This Michael Casey is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Michael Casey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
19%Michael Casey (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,545
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

19% percentile
025507510018.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.1%9.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate