Author summary
55% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,802 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mia Osmonbekov results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and False Dilemma , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 755 hits . Analysis detected 7,569 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,158 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 40% (4,038 of 6,628 authors). This Mia Osmonbekov is better (less manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group. Mia Osmonbekov
Author details
Total words: 9,158
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.2% 8.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.2%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst