Fortune54%

Trump stopped talking about these media stocks, but his portfolio didn’t stop trading them 42%

By Mia Osmonbekov55%

7/2/2026, 3:24:28 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Recency Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 1,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 661 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.2% and a BS Rank of 42% (12,726 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the article peer group.

Of the seven Fortune 500 companies in President Trump’s disclosed investment portfolio that also turn up somewhere in his public statements this year, five drew a clear 2026 comment from him: Apple, Nvidia, Boeing, Meta, and Disney  the last of which extends a fight that began in 2025. 
But two others followed the opposite path. 
Comcast and Warner Bros. 
Discovery’s CNN were both targets of pointed Trump criticism last year, and both have gone quiet since. 
Trump’s brokerage accounts, disclosed in his 2025 annual financial disclosure released in June 2026, traded Apple, Nvidia, Disney, Meta, Boeing, Warner Bros. 
Discovery and Comcast in 2025. 
Comcast notched 30 transactions across five accounts—more than Apple (28) and Nvidia (25) individually, and more than Boeing and Disney combined (21)—second only to Meta, at 33. 
In April, Trump paid tribute to Tim Cook and Apple and demanded Disney fire late-night host Jimmy Kimmel  a dispute that started in the fall of 2025, when Kimmel was first suspended over separate remarks. 
In May, Trump told Fox News that China would buy 200 Boeing jets and personally invited Nvidia’s Jensen Huang to join his China delegation. 
In January, he told executives at Davos that Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg had shown him an AI data center “basically the size of Manhattan.” 
Comcast, which donated millions toward Trump’s ballroom effort, and its corporate rival Warner Bros. 
Discovery were absent from all of it. 
The Trump Organization maintains that the accounts are run by independent managers with no input from the president or his family on what gets bought or sold. 
The Trump Organization did not respond immediately to Fortune’s request for comment, but the White House told Fortune that “neither the President nor his family has ever engaged  or will ever engage  in conflicts of interest.” 
Comcast’s June 29 decision to spin off NBCUniversal now puts that silence in front of the Federal Communication Commission–-which, under Trump’s appointee Brendan Carr, opened a formal investigation into Comcast’s DEI practices in February 2025 and has seemingly not closed it. 
Any moves by Comcast and NBCUniversal could trigger regulatory review because of Trump’s interest in media deals. 
Comcast is the second-most heavily traded name in Trump’s portfolio among those seven companies, and it’s now walking into a major regulatory moment with the spinoff—yet it’s the one he hasn’t said a word about this year, despite spending much of 2025 attacking it by name. 
Trump called CEO Brian Roberts a “lowlife” in February 2025 over the cancellation of an MSNBC host’s show. 
He said Comcast “should be forced to pay vast sums of money for the damage they’ve done to our Country.” 
In April 2025, he wrote that Comcast and Roberts “are a disgrace to the integrity of Broadcasting.” 
In May 2025, sitting beside South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office, he told a reporter that Roberts and “the people that run that place” should be “investigated.” 
In August, MSNBC rebranding to MS NOW drew a Trump post calling Roberts “dopey.” 
“Does President Trump’s silence on Comcast mean anything in the context of the fact that his financial accounts traded their stock numerous times? 
Just the fact that you have to ask the question points to the problem,” Ann Skeet, the senior director of leadership ethics at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, told Fortune over email. 
Comcast did not respond immediately to Fortune’s request for comment. 
Warner Bros. 
Discovery follows a similar pattern–scrutinized one year, and then silence the next. 
Trump has periodically pushed for CNN, the company’s cable news arm, to be sold or overhauled as it moves through a merger with Paramount Skydance, but the sharpest version of that complaint, calling CNN’s leadership “corrupt or incompetent,” traces to December. 
No comparably direct statement from 2026 turned up in this reporting. 
Warner Bros. 
Discovery did not respond immediately to Fortune’s request for comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 4.3%Fortune: 4.2%Confirmation Bias16.0%This article: 6.2%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.9%Fortune: 1.4%Anchoring Bias6.2%This article: 9.2%Mia Osmonbekov: 4.1%Fortune: 3.3%Availability Heuristic9.2%This article: 1.8%Mia Osmonbekov: 2.2%Fortune: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic1.8%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.9%Fortune: 1.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 1.6%Fortune: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Mia Osmonbekov: 7.7%Fortune: 6.7%Framing Effect1.1%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.4%Fortune: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 1.3%Fortune: 3.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 2.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 23.4%Mia Osmonbekov: 3.2%Fortune: 7.0%Negativity Bias23.4%This article: 7.9%Mia Osmonbekov: 1.7%Fortune: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.9%Fortune: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.2%Fortune: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 5.5%Fortune: 3.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.1%Fortune: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 14.2%Mia Osmonbekov: 2.2%Fortune: 1.5%Recency Bias14.2%This article: 4.5%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.6%Fortune: 0.3%Primacy Effect4.5%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Mia Osmonbekov: 1.7%Fortune: 0.7%Ad Hominem4.8%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.6%Fortune: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.7%Mia Osmonbekov: 5.2%Fortune: 4.8%Appeal to Authority5.7%This article: 10.1%Mia Osmonbekov: 5.3%Fortune: 2.2%False Dilemma10.1%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.4%Fortune: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.6%Mia Osmonbekov: 5.3%Fortune: 6.0%Hasty Generalization10.6%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.1%Fortune: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 1.4%Fortune: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.6%Mia Osmonbekov: 4.6%Fortune: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion5.6%This article: 11.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 1.4%Fortune: 1.2%Begging the Question11.0%This article: 14.2%Mia Osmonbekov: 8.2%Fortune: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.2%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.5%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.6%Fortune: 0.3%Burden of Proof4.5%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.8%Fortune: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.5%Mia Osmonbekov: 2.4%Fortune: 2.5%Anecdotal3.5%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.3%Mia Osmonbekov: 1.7%Fortune: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.3%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.2%Fortune: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.5%Mia Osmonbekov: 2.2%Fortune: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection6.5%This article: 4.1%Mia Osmonbekov: 1.6%Fortune: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice4.1%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.0%Fortune: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.6%Fortune: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mia Osmonbekov: 0.7%Fortune: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

661 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers15%attributed speech563writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTrump Organization • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWhite House • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageAnn Skeet • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ann Skeet

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words34% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Quote-first Misdirection-7.6 ptsWriter: 7.6%Ann Skeet: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.