Topic summary
52% 62 analyzed articles/videos 22,436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stock Market results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 11,130 hits . Analysis detected 113,723 faulty-reasoning hits from 116,640 analyzed words across 62 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (12,669 of 15,328 topics). This Stock Market is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Stock Market
Topic details
Total words: 116,640
Article count: 62
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score62 analyzed articles116.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst