BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Optimism Bias, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 1,017 faulty-reasoning hits from 698 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (10,514 of 21,182 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the article peer group.

My top 10 things to watch Monday, July 20 
1. 
This is a welcome sign: Stock futures are breaking the "Monday morning slide" pattern. 
Biggest gainer is the Nasdaq, benefiting from strength in semiconductor names including SK Hynix . 
Despite a weekend of more fighting in the Middle East, WTI crude is steady this morning. 
2. 
Plenty of stocks are working in this market, but spotting them requires looking beyond technology, where the once-hot trades have cooled. 
That was the crux of my Sunday column for Investing Club subscribers. 
3. 
The reverberations of Chinese startup Moonshot AI's new Kimi K3 model are still being felt. 
One of my biggest questions: Will large American corporations be comfortable switching to Kimi and having their data fed into a Chinese model? 
There's a consistent lack of trust between the U.S. and China. 
4. 
Bristol Myers Squibb is buying Nvidia 's newest enterprise AI computing system to use for drug discovery and development. 
Bristol Myers said using older Nvidia hardware has already changed its R&D process. 
Now it's got more horsepower to work with. 
Club names Eli Lilly and Nvidia also have a partnership for AI drug discovery. 
5. 
Can SpaceX break out of its slump? 
Shares are up about 1% premarket. 
The stock ended last week on a six-day losing streak and sits 8% below its IPO price of $135 (and almost 40% below its record close on June 16). 
Amazingly, the decline seems orderly. 
Short-selling pressure is playing a role, too. 
After aborting a Starship test flight last week, SpaceX plans to try again this Thursday evening. 
6. 
Barclays increased its price target on Astera Labs , a hedge-fund favorite, to $325 from $200. 
Kept its buy rating. 
Analysts said spending from Amazon alone could provide over $3 billion in revenue for Astera, a fast-growing player in connectivity technology for AI compute. 
Astera works closely with Nvidia. 
7. 
UBS started coverage of Honeywell Aerospace with a hold rating and a $231 price target, citing slower aftermarket growth. 
Aftermarket consists of products and services needed after the initial aircraft sale, such as runway safety technology. 
Big profit driver. 
Aeromexico announced this morning that it would implement HONA's anti-collision Surface Alerts across its Boeing planes. 
8. 
Wells Fargo cut its Accenture price target to $194 from $200 but kept its buy rating. 
Heaven forbid anyone would ever cut their rating on this one. 
The analysts slightly raised their full-year earnings estimates after the consultancy's recent $5 billion debt raise and suggestion that $2 billion in share repurchases would be completed by the fourth quarter. 
9. 
Yeti got an upgrade to buy from hold at Goldman Sachs, which also raised its price target to $63 from $46. 
The analysts said their channel checks showed the cooler company's growth outlook is "becoming more durable." 
But they also cited some inventory constraints and planned restocking. 
Been a forgettable couple of years for this stock. 
10. 
Citi analysts raised their PNC Financial price target to $290 from $280 and kept their buy rating. 
PNC is a forever-loved regional. 
Last Wednesday, PNC reported better-than-expected earnings and revenue in the second quarter. 
Citi liked what it saw, as did others. 
Lots of other analysts hiked their price targets last week. 
Sign up for my Top 10 Morning Thoughts on the Market email newsletter for free (See here for a full list of the stocks at Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust.) 
As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. 
Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. 
If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. 
THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . 
NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. 
NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.2%Jim Cramer: 4.5%CNBC: 4.5%Confirmation Bias8.2%This article: 10.0%Jim Cramer: 4.7%CNBC: 1.8%Anchoring Bias10.0%This article: 3.4%Jim Cramer: 1.9%CNBC: 3.2%Availability Heuristic3.4%This article: 2.0%Jim Cramer: 0.7%CNBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Jim Cramer: 2.7%CNBC: 6.8%Framing Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.7%Jim Cramer: 0.9%CNBC: 0.8%Status Quo Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.9%Jim Cramer: 7.2%CNBC: 7.5%Optimism Bias9.9%This article: 0.7%Jim Cramer: 0.2%CNBC: 2.2%Pessimism Bias0.7%This article: 7.7%Jim Cramer: 3.0%CNBC: 6.6%Negativity Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Jim Cramer: 0.5%CNBC: 0.8%In-Group Bias1.6%This article: 4.9%Jim Cramer: 4.3%CNBC: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.9%This article: 5.0%Jim Cramer: 3.2%CNBC: 3.0%Halo Effect5.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.3%Jim Cramer: 5.1%CNBC: 2.2%Recency Bias9.3%This article: 0.7%Jim Cramer: 0.2%CNBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.7%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Jim Cramer: 0.5%CNBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem1.6%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 25.4%Jim Cramer: 10.0%CNBC: 4.9%Appeal to Authority25.4%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.3%Jim Cramer: 3.2%CNBC: 4.3%Hasty Generalization6.3%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.6%Jim Cramer: 2.1%CNBC: 0.6%Bandwagon2.6%This article: 2.3%Jim Cramer: 1.3%CNBC: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion2.3%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.7%Jim Cramer: 2.9%CNBC: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.7%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.4%Jim Cramer: 1.5%CNBC: 1.2%Anecdotal4.4%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.3%Jim Cramer: 2.4%CNBC: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.3%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 2.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.4%Jim Cramer: 11.0%CNBC: 3.6%Biased Writer Voice7.4%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Cramer: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Jim Cramer: 8.5%CNBC: 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.0%

698 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers23%attributed speech537writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Jim Cramer • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageBristol Myers Squibb • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageBarclays • 16 words • 0.0% coverageBarclays • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageUBS • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWells Fargo • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageGoldman Sachs • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageCiti • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageJim Cramer • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Goldman Sachs

100%flagged-word coverage
21 attributed words13% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.7 ptsWriter: 11.7%Goldman Sachs: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.7 ptsWriter: 9.7%Goldman Sachs: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.