Topic summary
47% 9 analyzed articles/videos 3,494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Investing results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,506 hits . Analysis detected 15,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,748 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,562 of 16,562 topics). This Investing is better (less manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group. Investing
Topic details
Total words: 14,748
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CNBC 54% 7/23/2026, 4:53:57 PM
CNBC 54% 7/28/2020, 5:13:44 PM
CNBC 54% 9/25/2019, 3:01:24 AM
CNBC 54% 8/1/2019, 7:30:19 AM
CNBC 54% 8/1/2019, 7:30:19 AM