Publication summary
54% 77 analyzed articles/videos 27,939 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CNBC results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 10,627 hits . Analysis detected 119,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 141,853 analyzed words across 77 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 34% (266 of 398 publications). This CNBC is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 141,853
Article count: 77
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score77 analyzed articles141.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CNBC 54% 7/23/2026, 11:53:57 PM