Author summary
52% 1 analyzed article/video 1,695 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angelica Peebles results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 720 hits . Analysis detected 3,349 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,085 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,314 of 6,359 authors). This Angelica Peebles is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Angelica Peebles
Author details
Total words: 5,085
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.2% 14.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst