Author summary
44% 1 analyzed article/video 1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lorie Konish results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Pessimism Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 471 hits . Analysis detected 1,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,099 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,850 of 6,342 authors). This Lorie Konish is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Lorie Konish
Author details
Total words: 3,099
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst