Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Arjun Kharpal results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Quote-first Misdirection , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 218 hits . Analysis detected 1,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,845 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,170 authors). This Arjun Kharpal is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Arjun Kharpal
Author details
Total words: 1,845
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 10.5% 10.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.2% 11.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 10.5%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst