Author summary
75%2 analyzed articles/videos282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lee Ying Shan results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,612 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,632 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,138 of 6,628 authors). This Lee Ying Shan is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
Lee Ying Shan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
83%Lee Ying Shan (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,632
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510082.8% percentile
4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.8%9.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 5.9%5.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 5.9%5.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.8%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos