Publication summary
87% 78 analyzed articles/videos 24,412 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Futurism results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 31,525 hits . Analysis detected 214,754 faulty-reasoning hits from 138,974 analyzed words across 78 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (103 of 398 publications). This Futurism is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 138,974
Article count: 78
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.3% percentile 2.9% BS Score78 analyzed articles139K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 11.4% 11.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 20.6% 20.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 9.3% 9.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 6.9% 6.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 22.7% 22.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 22.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 20.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst