Author summary
68% 21 analyzed articles/videos 6,364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frank Landymore results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 8,788 hits . Analysis detected 55,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,005 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,204 of 6,215 authors). This Frank Landymore is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Frank Landymore
Author details
Total words: 41,005
Article count: 21
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score21 analyzed articles41K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst