Publication summary
88% 80 analyzed articles/videos 23,911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Futurism results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 31,982 hits . Analysis detected 217,934 faulty-reasoning hits from 141,230 analyzed words across 80 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (101 of 398 publications). This Futurism is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 141,230
Article count: 80
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score80 analyzed articles141.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 20.8% 20.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 9.3% 9.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 22.6% 22.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 6.2% 6.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 22.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 20.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst