Author summary
83% 18 analyzed articles/videos 5,426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victor Tangermann results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 7,660 hits . Analysis detected 53,074 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,269 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,621 of 6,171 authors). This Victor Tangermann is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group. Victor Tangermann
Author details
Total words: 34,269
Article count: 18
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score18 analyzed articles34.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.5% 21.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 22.4% 22.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst