Topic summary
40% 49 analyzed articles/videos 36,499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Space Exploration results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 12,121 hits . Analysis detected 127,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 166,760 analyzed words across 49 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (14,808 of 15,759 topics). This Space Exploration is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group. Space Exploration
Topic details
Total words: 166,760
Article count: 49
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score49 analyzed articles166.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst