Mediaite70%

Elon Musk Isn’t a Trillionaire Anymore, Says Forbes  SpaceX Stock Dropped After Aborted Launch 63%

By Sarah Rumpf42%

7/18/2026, 12:58:35 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 982 faulty-reasoning hits from 443 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (7,709 of 20,544 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.50% of the article peer group.

The world’s first trillionaire is back to slumming it among the billionaires, according to a report by Forbes. 
That’s right. 
Elon Musk saw his net worth drop back to a mere twelve digits after the SpaceX stock price took a tumble after the latest failed Starship launch attempt, reported Forbes’ Ty Roush on Friday. 
Musk became the world’s first trillionaire last month after SpaceX went public in the largest initial public offering in history. 
He holds 4.8 billion shares of SpaceX, plus another 350 million stock options, and about 700 million shares of Tesla. 
The SpaceX IPO price was $135 and the stock saw a spike in the days that followed but has since been on a downward trend. 
On Monday, Forbes reported that SpaceX shares had declined 3.8% to just under $140 by the afternoon and Tesla shares saw a similar 3% drop. 
Friday, SpaceX was down to $124 at the end of the day and at the end of “a five-day losing streak for the stock,” wrote Roush. 
These stock price hits dragged Musk’s net worth down billions of dollars, Roush reported. 
Forbes calculates Musk’s peak net worth as $1.45 trillion on June 16, when SpaceX shares hit the stock’s all-time high. 
Since then, the former DOGE chief has lost nearly $700 billion and is now worth $792.8 billion. 
That’s enough to buy nearly eight million of the “Cyberbeast” model of the 2026 Tesla Cybertruck . 
(7,773,692 Cybertrucks to be precise, with a base model price of $101,985 ). 
Musk posted about the “automatic launch abort” for the latest Starship attempt on Thursday evening, posting on the X platform he owns that it was caused when “[s]ome of the engines didn’t start.” 
He added that another attempt would be made “hopefully in a few days,” and that the “most probable launch timing is early next week.” 
Some of the engines didn’t start, triggering an automatic launch abort. 
Now offloading propellant. 
Next launch attempt hopefully in a few days. 
- Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 16, 2026 
To be confident of a good flight, 2 Raptors will be removed & replaced. 
Most probable launch timing is early next week. 
- Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 17, 2026 
Musk may no longer be a trillionaire, but Forbes still ranks him as the richest person in the world, more than doubling his nearest competitors, Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin , worth $282 billion and $260.1 billion respectively. 
The post Elon Musk Isn’t a Trillionaire Anymore, Says Forbes  SpaceX Stock Dropped After Aborted Launch first appeared on Mediaite . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.5%Sarah Rumpf: 4.2%Mediaite: 4.9%Confirmation Bias0.5%This article: 10.2%Sarah Rumpf: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.9%Anchoring Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 1.5%Mediaite: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.8%Mediaite: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.5%Mediaite: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Sarah Rumpf: 2.2%Mediaite: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias6.1%This article: 7.2%Sarah Rumpf: 5.5%Mediaite: 9.1%Framing Effect7.2%This article: 18.7%Sarah Rumpf: 1.2%Mediaite: 0.5%Loss Aversion18.7%This article: 9.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.4%Status Quo Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.2%Sarah Rumpf: 2.1%Mediaite: 1.2%Optimism Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.6%Mediaite: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 26.6%Sarah Rumpf: 8.8%Mediaite: 14.8%Negativity Bias26.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.6%Mediaite: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 1.0%Mediaite: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.7%Mediaite: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 1.1%Mediaite: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 1.7%Mediaite: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Sarah Rumpf: 1.0%Mediaite: 1.4%Halo Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 1.3%Mediaite: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.5%Sarah Rumpf: 1.3%Mediaite: 2.3%Recency Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 2.7%Mediaite: 3.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.7%Mediaite: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 21.0%Sarah Rumpf: 3.1%Mediaite: 3.7%Appeal to Authority21.0%This article: 9.0%Sarah Rumpf: 1.7%Mediaite: 2.4%False Dilemma9.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 1.7%Mediaite: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 2.8%Mediaite: 7.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.6%Sarah Rumpf: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.8%Bandwagon5.6%This article: 3.8%Sarah Rumpf: 5.7%Mediaite: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion3.8%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 2.4%Mediaite: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 19.2%Sarah Rumpf: 1.4%Mediaite: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.6%Mediaite: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.5%Mediaite: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.8%Mediaite: 2.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.4%Sarah Rumpf: 1.9%Mediaite: 2.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.6%Mediaite: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.2%Sarah Rumpf: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.1%Special Pleading3.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.4%Sarah Rumpf: 1.3%Mediaite: 3.3%Unattributed Quote7.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 2.8%Mediaite: 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 30.0%Sarah Rumpf: 12.1%Mediaite: 8.5%Biased Writer Voice30.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 2.1%Mediaite: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 3.8%Mediaite: 2.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf: 0.7%Mediaite: 1.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Sarah Rumpf: 2.0%Mediaite: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.8%

443 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers30%attributed speech312writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageTy Roush • 26 words • 100.0% coverageTy Roush • 14 words • 0.0% coverageForbes • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageElon Musk • 33 words • 100.0% coverageElon Musk • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageElon Musk • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageElon Musk • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ty Roush

100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words31% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Biased Writer Voice+30.7 ptsWriter: 34.3%Ty Roush: 65.0%65.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%Ty Roush: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.