Publication summary
70% 96 analyzed articles/videos 32,339 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mediaite results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 22,293 hits . Analysis detected 174,215 faulty-reasoning hits from 150,993 analyzed words across 96 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 58% (162 of 379 publications). This Mediaite is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 150,993
Article count: 96
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score96 analyzed articles151K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 14.8% 14.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst