Mediaite71%

‘All I’m Thinking About Is Her Behind’: Greg Gutfeld’s AOC Punchline Falls Flat With Co-Hosts 71%

By Zoe Engels54%

7/21/2026, 12:59:34 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 884 faulty-reasoning hits from 507 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.8% and a BS Rank of 71% (6,196 of 21,174 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 70.70% of the article peer group.

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld tried his hand at a joke about Rep. 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D-NY) “behind,” which bottomed out with his Five co-hosts. 
Gutfeld delivered his odd joke during a conversation among The Five co-hosts about Ocasio-Cortez’s accent at a Memphis rally for House candidate and Tennessee state Rep. 
Justin J. 
Pearson (D). 
They accused Ocasio-Cortez of breaking out a faux southern twang and heavy drawl during her speech. 
“We cannot afford to leave Tennessee behind,” she said in the speech. 
“We cannot afford to leave Kentucky behind, Alabama behind, Mississippi behind, Georgia behind, South Carolina behind.” 
Guest co-host Charlie Hurt said the incident helps prove Ocasio-Cortez is a “faker.” 
“I think that she is going to be the Democrat nominee because that’s where all of the energy is,” he offered up the prediction with which guest co-host Kennedy later disagreed. 
“And that’s exactly as far as she’ll get. 
She will not get any further because of exactly this because at the end of the day, she’s a faker.” 
Gutfeld later jumped in to deliver his punchline, with a particular focus on Ocasio-Cortez’s word choice instead of her hotly debated accent. 
“I think she’s an absolute genius,” he said sarcastically. 
“I want to read that quote again. 
I’m going to tell you why. 
Okay? 
‘We cannot afford to leave Tennessee behind, Kennedy behind, Alabama behind, Mississippi behind, Georgia behind, South Carolina behind.’ 
She mentions behind six times, and all I’m thinking about is her behind.” 
His joke was met largely with silence and a seemingly forced courtesy chuckle or two in the background. 
Gutfeld paused momentarily, presumably for more laughter than he received, before he continued: 
Look, I don’t know what she believes in, so I looked it up. 
Apparently her issues are Green New Deal. 
Remember that? 
Medicare for all, affordable housing, economic justice, criminal justice reform. 
So, I wanted to look up debates where she debated these topics, as you said. 
She’s only appeared in town halls, which is usually curated, campaign events, Congressional hearings where she gets to pose the questions. 
But there’s never a point where anyone asks her about the data or the outcomes, like nobody asks her about the the Amazon thing or how would this work? 
No one has ever asked her like, “Okay, when you close the jails”  it’s a really simple question  ‘what happens to the criminals? 
What happens to the victims? 
You oppose family separations of illegals, but what happens when the adult has to go to jail? 
How do you convince landlords to rent when you oppose evictions and background checks? 
How do you explain these things?’ 
She’s never had to explain anything, which is why almost everything she says isn’t memorable except for when she mentions her behind six times. 
Watch above via Fox News. 
The post ‘All I’m Thinking About Is Her Behind’: Greg Gutfeld’s AOC Punchline Falls Flat With Co-Hosts first appeared on Mediaite . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.9%Zoe Engels: 4.3%Mediaite: 5.0%Confirmation Bias7.9%This article: 2.6%Zoe Engels: 0.7%Mediaite: 0.9%Anchoring Bias2.6%This article: 20.5%Zoe Engels: 4.4%Mediaite: 3.7%Availability Heuristic20.5%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.1%Mediaite: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 1.2%Mediaite: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Zoe Engels: 1.2%Mediaite: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias2.6%This article: 4.3%Zoe Engels: 5.4%Mediaite: 9.1%Framing Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.1%Zoe Engels: 0.5%Mediaite: 0.4%Status Quo Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.7%Mediaite: 1.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Zoe Engels: 0.5%Mediaite: 1.6%Pessimism Bias4.9%This article: 13.0%Zoe Engels: 8.6%Mediaite: 14.6%Negativity Bias13.0%This article: 3.9%Zoe Engels: 1.3%Mediaite: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias3.9%This article: 2.6%Zoe Engels: 1.4%Mediaite: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error2.6%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 4.2%Mediaite: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 5.3%Mediaite: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 2.8%Mediaite: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 1.6%Mediaite: 2.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 6.4%Mediaite: 3.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 4.2%Mediaite: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 1.2%Mediaite: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 7.7%Zoe Engels: 4.5%Mediaite: 2.4%False Dilemma7.7%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.0%Mediaite: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.9%Zoe Engels: 1.2%Mediaite: 0.3%Circular Reasoning3.9%This article: 29.6%Zoe Engels: 12.9%Mediaite: 7.5%Hasty Generalization29.6%This article: 7.3%Zoe Engels: 1.1%Mediaite: 0.4%Red Herring7.3%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.3%Zoe Engels: 2.7%Mediaite: 6.7%Appeal to Emotion4.3%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 2.2%Mediaite: 1.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.6%Mediaite: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.7%Zoe Engels: 1.8%Mediaite: 1.2%Burden of Proof4.7%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.5%Mediaite: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.3%Zoe Engels: 0.7%Mediaite: 2.8%Anecdotal6.3%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.5%Mediaite: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.3%Zoe Engels: 1.8%Mediaite: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.3%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 1.2%Mediaite: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.7%Zoe Engels: 0.9%Mediaite: 3.3%Unattributed Quote5.7%This article: 3.6%Zoe Engels: 2.1%Mediaite: 3.2%Quote-first Misdirection3.6%This article: 26.4%Zoe Engels: 10.7%Mediaite: 8.3%Biased Writer Voice26.4%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 1.6%Mediaite: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.7%Mediaite: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoe Engels: 0.6%Mediaite: 1.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Zoe Engels: 0.2%Mediaite: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.0%

507 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers63%attributed speech189writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez • 16 words • 0.0% coverageCharlie Hurt • 13 words • 0.0% coverageCharlie Hurt • 31 words • 0.0% coverageCharlie Hurt • 8 words • 0.0% coverageCharlie Hurt • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 9 words • 100.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 6 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 1 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 18 words • 100.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 13 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 2 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 10 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 15 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 21 words • 100.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 29 words • 100.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 25 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 14 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gutfeld • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Charlie Hurt

100%flagged-word coverage
72 attributed words23% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Biased Writer Voice-55.0 ptsWriter: 55.0%Charlie Hurt: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Charlie Hurt: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.