Topic summary
74%108 analyzed articles/videos63,762 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Commentary results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 71,157 hits. Analysis detected 510,277 faulty-reasoning hits from 336,940 analyzed words across 108 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,854 of 16,562 topics). This Political Commentary is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score108 analyzed articles336.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.1%21.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.0%14.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate