Author summary
92% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,119 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Longwell results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 1,400 hits . Analysis detected 10,526 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,913 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,123 of 6,171 authors). This Sarah Longwell is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Sarah Longwell
Author details
Total words: 4,913
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.8% percentile 4.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 28.5% 28.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 27.0% 27.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 14.5% 14.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.3% 7.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.9% 25.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 28.5%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 9.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Horn Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst