Publication summary
73% 60 analyzed articles/videos 19,621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Bulwark results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 22,228 hits . Analysis detected 166,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 146,249 analyzed words across 60 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 58% (170 of 401 publications). This The Bulwark is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 146,249
Article count: 60
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score60 analyzed articles146.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 15.2% 15.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 15.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst