Author summary
52% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,863 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Egan results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 1,438 hits . Analysis detected 12,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,938 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,785 of 6,554 authors). This Lauren Egan is better (less manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group. Lauren Egan
Author details
Total words: 10,938
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.6% 11.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst