Author summary
78% 14 analyzed articles/videos 3,216 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Vespa results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 4,929 hits . Analysis detected 40,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,800 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,612 of 6,194 authors). This Matt Vespa is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Matt Vespa
Author details
Total words: 25,800
Article count: 14
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score14 analyzed articles25.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.1% 19.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.9% 13.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst