Townhall85%

What Caused This GOP Rep to Tear Into Jamie Raskin 63%

By Matt Vespa79%

7/1/2026, 7:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.2% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 1,153 faulty-reasoning hits from 477 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58% and a BS Rank of 63% (7,740 of 20,517 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the article peer group.

Yesterday, a House hearing on the impacts of sanctuary cities turned into a shouting match between Rep. 
Mike Lawler (R-NY) and Jamie Raskin (D-MD). 
Democrats, of course, treated Jessica Gorman with disdain. 
She’s the mother of Sheridan, who was shot and killed by an illegal alien earlier this year. 
What’s painfully clear again is that Democrats prioritize the rights and needs of illegal aliens over American citizens. 
Lawler's feelings about his colleagues on this issue spilled over into a shouting match between him and Raskin. 
The former stated that Democrats care more about anti-ICE radicals than about American citizens killed by people who shouldn’t be here, coddled and enabled by the Democrats’ pro-open border policies (via NY Post): 
Whatever. 
Pretti and Good were also two left-wing whack jobs who got what they deserved. 
Also, no one cares who they are or were. 
One tried to run over a federal agent and was shot and killed, as she should have been. 
That’s what happens when you try to run over a cop, you idiot. 
At the same time, Lawler should’ve known Democrats held these feelings about immigration. 
It’s not like it’s a secret or anything. 
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
The congressman went on to scold Democrats for seemingly being more concerned about the deaths of anti-ICE protesters than the victims of migrant crime. 
“The same outrage you feel about Renée Good and Alex Pretti you should feel about Sheridan Gorman and Laken Riley,” Lawler fumed. 
“You do not!” 
Lawler raged.” 
Because if you did you would not support sanctuary jurisdictions 
“You should be ashamed of yourself!” 
Raskin, the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, noted that Lawler was not a member of the panel and asked him to “get the hell out” as they both shouted over each other. 
“You don’t understand the rules of the committee. 
You don’t understand the Constitution. 
You’re full of it!” 
Raskin yelled. 
“You’re an absolute disgrace for supporting sanctuary policies,” Lawler countered. 
“Say one word about Alex Pretti and Renée Good,” Raskin demanded. 
To which Lawker responded, “I did! 
I wrote a whole New York Times op-ed about it.” 
“You should be absolutely ashamed of yourself for not opposing sanctuary policies that resulted in their daughter’s death!” 
he added, ending the argument. 
Nelly Decker, a spokeswoman for Raskin, argued the Maryland Democrat’s outburst was justified. 
“Of course Raskin yelled at [Lawler], he was a guest in the committee to introduce a witness and went on a tangent and sullied the names of Alex Pretti and Renee Good,” Decker wrote on X. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.3%Matt Vespa: 5.9%Townhall: 5.2%Confirmation Bias20.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.7%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Matt Vespa: 2.7%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic3.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.9%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.7%Matt Vespa: 1.2%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.9%Townhall: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Matt Vespa: 8.8%Townhall: 11.4%Framing Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.5%Townhall: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.2%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.2%Townhall: 1.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 2.3%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 35.2%Matt Vespa: 13.9%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias35.2%This article: 2.7%Matt Vespa: 1.2%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias2.7%This article: 2.7%Matt Vespa: 1.5%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Matt Vespa: 5.3%Townhall: 4.7%In-Group Bias9.2%This article: 2.9%Matt Vespa: 2.8%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 2.1%Townhall: 1.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.8%Townhall: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.2%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Matt Vespa: 0.8%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.1%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Matt Vespa: 6.5%Townhall: 5.1%Ad Hominem9.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.3%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.8%Matt Vespa: 4.0%Townhall: 4.5%Appeal to Authority4.8%This article: 18.7%Matt Vespa: 2.3%Townhall: 2.0%False Dilemma18.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 2.5%Townhall: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 7.5%Matt Vespa: 0.3%Townhall: 0.1%Circular Reasoning7.5%This article: 12.4%Matt Vespa: 9.7%Townhall: 9.2%Hasty Generalization12.4%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.4%Townhall: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.6%Matt Vespa: 1.6%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon3.6%This article: 26.8%Matt Vespa: 9.4%Townhall: 11.3%Appeal to Emotion26.8%This article: 2.1%Matt Vespa: 2.5%Townhall: 2.2%Begging the Question2.1%This article: 10.7%Matt Vespa: 2.0%Townhall: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.3%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.3%Matt Vespa: 2.1%Townhall: 1.6%Burden of Proof2.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 2.3%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.3%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.9%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.2%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.3%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 3.2%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 7.5%Matt Vespa: 2.9%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection7.5%This article: 8.6%Matt Vespa: 19.1%Townhall: 16.3%Biased Writer Voice8.6%This article: 10.1%Matt Vespa: 4.7%Townhall: 5.7%Indoctrination10.1%This article: 7.5%Matt Vespa: 0.7%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias7.5%This article: 13.6%Matt Vespa: 13.4%Townhall: 14.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias13.6%This article: 9.2%Matt Vespa: 5.5%Townhall: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.2%

477 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers36%attributed speech304writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMike Lawler (R-NY) • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageTownhall VIP • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMike Lawler (R-NY) • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Raskin (D-MD) • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageMike Lawler (R-NY) • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Raskin (D-MD) • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageNelly Decker • 13 words • 0.0% coverageNelly Decker • 36 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Nelly Decker

100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words28% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Quote-first Misdirection+73.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Nelly Decker: 73.5%73.5%Politically Left Leaning B+73.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Nelly Decker: 73.5%73.5%Indoctrination-15.8 ptsWriter: 15.8%Nelly Decker: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -10.5 ptsWriter: 10.5%Nelly Decker: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.9 ptsWriter: 9.9%Nelly Decker: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Nelly Decker: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.