Topic summary
62% 19 analyzed articles/videos 5,488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us House Of Representatives results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 6,151 hits . Analysis detected 46,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,131 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (10,634 of 15,882 topics). This Us House Of Representatives is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Us House Of Representatives
Topic details
Total words: 39,131
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score19 analyzed articles39.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.7% 15.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst