Author summary
83% 14 analyzed articles/videos 6,337 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Singer results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 8,000 hits . Analysis detected 49,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,300 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,250 of 6,172 authors). This Emily Singer is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Emily Singer
Author details
Total words: 29,300
Article count: 14
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.6% percentile 3.2% BS Score14 analyzed articles29.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 27.3% 27.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.8%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst