Daily Kos85%

Trump loves to keep it in the family—but nepo sisters are new 68%

By Emily Singer83%

7/17/2026, 9:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 735 faulty-reasoning hits from 476 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61.3% and a BS Rank of 68% (6,905 of 21,198 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump already pushed the South Carolina governor to appoint the late-Sen. 
Lindsey Graham‘s sister, Darline Graham Nordone, to finish out the remaining six months of his term. 
Trump said doing as such would be a tribute to Graham, who raised his sister from the time she was a teenager after both of their parents died, and would often have her alongside him at campaign events and speeches. 
But now, Trump is officially putting his thumb on the scale to help Nordone replace her late brother for a full term, endorsing her to be the GOP nominee for the November race. 
Nordone has reportedly expressed interest in running for the position. 
Of course, it’s unclear whether a Trump endorsement would be enough to get Nordone over the hump in the condensed primary to replace Graham on the ballot, which will take place on Aug. 
11. 
A number of other Republicans could run, including Reps. 
Nancy Mace, Ralph Norman, and Russell Fry, as well as Lt. 
Gov. 
Pamela Evette, who just came in second in the state’s gubernatorial primary. 
And given many of the rumored candidates have established constituencies, fundraising bases to pull from, and records to run on, they would likely have a leg up on her. 
Related | Which Republican ghoul will take Lindsey Graham’s spot? 
Nordone has none of those assets—just shared blood with her brother, who had been South Carolina’s senior senator for more than 23 years. 
In fact, it’s unclear what Nordone’s politics are at all. 
Yes, she stood alongside her brother for years. 
But according to the 19th—a media outlet that focuses on gender in politics—Nordone has not been an overtly political person. 
She has made just one singular political contribution since 1990—a $100 donation to now-former state Sen. 
Katrina Shealy, a Republican who lost a GOP primary last month. 
Rather than be an overt partisan, Nordone has worked as a disability rights advocate, serving as the head of South Carolina’s Commission for the Blind since 2019, according to the 19th. 
“She’s just been there for Lindsey always, but I don’t think she’s really that political,” Shealy told the 19th. 
An Emerson College poll released Thursday that surveyed a list of potential Republican primary candidates showed Nordone in seventh place out of eight polled contenders—above Appalachian Trail hiking former Rep. 
Mark Sanford and “someone else.” 
Trump’s endorsement could change that. 
However, South Carolina voters just showed that Trump’s blessing is not the be-all, end-all for them, as Trump had backed Evette in the governor’s race and she lost handily. 
If Nordone does, however, run for and win a full-term in the Senate, Nordone would have the title of the first nepo sister, as she was not Graham’s scion but rather his sibling. 
What a time to be alive. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 6.2%Daily Kos: 5.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.9%Daily Kos: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Emily Singer: 4.2%Daily Kos: 3.3%Availability Heuristic3.4%This article: 15.5%Emily Singer: 1.7%Daily Kos: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic15.5%This article: 6.1%Emily Singer: 1.7%Daily Kos: 0.9%Hindsight Bias6.1%This article: 1.1%Emily Singer: 2.6%Daily Kos: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias1.1%This article: 9.5%Emily Singer: 9.6%Daily Kos: 9.0%Framing Effect9.5%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.4%Daily Kos: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.4%Daily Kos: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 2.1%Daily Kos: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Emily Singer: 3.0%Daily Kos: 2.0%Pessimism Bias2.1%This article: 15.1%Emily Singer: 19.0%Daily Kos: 15.5%Negativity Bias15.1%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 1.0%Daily Kos: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Emily Singer: 4.2%Daily Kos: 2.6%Fundamental Attribution Error4.8%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.2%Daily Kos: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 2.3%Daily Kos: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 1.3%Daily Kos: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Emily Singer: 0.9%Daily Kos: 1.8%Halo Effect8.4%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 1.2%Daily Kos: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%Emily Singer: 2.4%Daily Kos: 1.5%Recency Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Emily Singer: 8.4%Daily Kos: 5.9%Ad Hominem7.4%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.7%Daily Kos: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.7%Emily Singer: 3.6%Daily Kos: 3.1%Appeal to Authority10.7%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 1.9%Daily Kos: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 2.0%Daily Kos: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.6%Daily Kos: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.5%Emily Singer: 10.1%Daily Kos: 9.7%Hasty Generalization9.5%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 1.2%Daily Kos: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.5%Daily Kos: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.4%Emily Singer: 7.9%Daily Kos: 7.3%Appeal to Emotion3.4%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 1.4%Daily Kos: 1.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.1%Emily Singer: 6.1%Daily Kos: 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.1%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 1.7%Daily Kos: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 1.2%Daily Kos: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.0%Emily Singer: 1.4%Daily Kos: 2.1%Anecdotal4.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.0%Emily Singer: 1.8%Daily Kos: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.2%Daily Kos: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.1%Emily Singer: 2.8%Daily Kos: 2.8%Unattributed Quote2.1%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 2.2%Daily Kos: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 24.6%Emily Singer: 27.4%Daily Kos: 23.2%Biased Writer Voice24.6%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 1.5%Daily Kos: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 6.5%Emily Singer: 14.6%Daily Kos: 10.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.5%Daily Kos: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 2.7%Daily Kos: 2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

476 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers23%attributed speech366writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coveragethe 19th • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coveragethe 19th • 31 words • 100.0% coverageKatrina Shealy • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

the 19th

100%flagged-word coverage
51 attributed words46% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Politically Left Leaning B+60.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%the 19th: 60.8%60.8%Biased Writer Voice-32.0 ptsWriter: 32.0%the 19th: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%the 19th: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.