Topic summary
⁠96%2 analyzed articles/videos590 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nepotism results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 48.2% saturation with 1,540 hits. Analysis detected 6,339 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,198 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,924 of 16,562 topics). This Nepotism is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Nepotism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,198
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.3% percentile
5.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 48.2%48.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.3%29.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 48.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos