Author summary
97% 11 analyzed articles/videos 4,951 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Needham results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 58.8% saturation with 16,997 hits . Analysis detected 71,840 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,930 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,159 of 6,189 authors). This Lisa Needham is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Lisa Needham
Author details
Total words: 28,930
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.3% percentile 4.8% BS Score11 analyzed articles28.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 58.8% 58.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 18.3% 18.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 18.0% 18.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 31.2% 31.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.8% 14.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 58.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 31.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Author 18.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 18.0%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst