Keyword summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 1,996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsey-Graham results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.4% saturation with 2,180 hits . Analysis detected 7,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (15,868 of 34,832 keywords). This Lindsey-Graham is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group. Lindsey-Graham
Keyword details
Total words: 5,988
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.4% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 36.4% 36.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 36.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst