Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Morgan Rimmer results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 1,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,335 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Morgan Rimmer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Morgan Rimmer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Morgan Rimmer (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,335
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 11.9%11.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 7.6%7.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 10.5%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos