Publication summary
73% 114 analyzed articles/videos 58,932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington Examiner results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 37,974 hits . Analysis detected 363,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 322,742 analyzed words across 114 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (173 of 395 publications). This Washington Examiner is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 322,742
Article count: 114
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score114 analyzed articles322.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 11.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst