The world’s deadliest conflict: Ignored from the UN to Michelle Obama 92%
By Charles Jacobs0% Walid Phares0%
7/23/2026, 1:00:00 PM
Keywords: Africa, Europe, Identity Politics, Islam, Michelle Obama, Nigeria, Terrorism, United Nations
BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 1,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 808 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 86.1% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,788 of 20,517 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 91.30% of the article peer group.
Over the past decade, jihadist violence in sub-Saharan Africa has killed more than 150,000 people — a toll that likely exceeds the entire recorded history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including after Oct.
7, 2023.
Amnesty International has not called an emergency session of the U.N.
Security Council, the university protesters are absent, and op-ed pages have been largely quiet.
Who hears about the Ahmadiyya Muslims of Pakistan killed for how they pray, or the Coptic Christians of Egypt who live under systemic persecution by the Muslim Brotherhood, whose churches are bombed and whose women are kidnapped and forced to convert to Islam?
Add the intimidation of Egyptian liberals and journalists by Muslim Brotherhood jihadists.
Nigerian Christians suffer massacres weekly — often daily.
The Druze, the Kurds, the Christians, and the Alawites of Syria are experiencing similar attacks.
With impressive consistency, all these people are ignored or downplayed by those in the West who claim to be at the forefront of human rights battles.
Jihadist violence erupts in Europe’s cities, yet to name it risks opprobrium, penalties, and even jail.
How can this be?
The ideology that increasingly dominates Western institutions is founded on so-called anticolonialism, which views history as a story of “white oppression” inflicted upon peoples around the globe through imperialist ventures.
That same oppression, it is posited, is mirrored inside Western societies by a “white supremacy” that dominates domestic minorities.
This framework sorts all humanity into two groups: oppressors and oppressed.
Moral status is fixed according to one’s place in this binary schema rather than by actual behavior or culpability.
A major corollary: the “oppressed” may not be judged or criticized.
The anticolonialist paradigm has no vocabulary for when a group defined as oppressed within the West is itself an oppressor.
Adherents to this progressivism are, by the definitions of their own framework, made mute when confronted with an Arab jihadist murdering gay men, Nigerian Islamist militiamen enslaving other black Africans, or men “of color” stoning adulteresses.
The policy of purposefully ignoring horrors committed by what has become a reflexively shielded category of aggressors is devastating to every group across the globe that is terrorized by jihadists.
It is a virtual death sentence to besieged minorities.
Jihadists’ persecution has reduced African Christians to an oppressed group across much of their own continent.
But, because their suffering is inflicted by a “protected class,” it generates no institutional outrage.
In Nigeria, Boko Haram and its offshoots have killed tens of thousands of Christians and displaced millions more.
In Sudan, jihadist militias have razed churches to the ground and drag women off into sexual slavery — some literally in chains.
In the Central African Republic, armed Islamist groups massacre civilians with a frequency that would capture international headlines were the perpetrators white.
Across the Sahel, a region stretching from Senegal to Somalia, the combination of jihadist insurgency and institutional abandonment has produced a humanitarian catastrophe of historic proportions.
According to the Global Terrorism Index, the countries most affected by terrorism in 2025 include Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, and Syria.
The West’s human rights establishment built its reputation defending the very groups they are now abandoning.
Liberal institutions in the West have been captured, gradually and deliberately, by an ideology that assigns virtue and villainy by identity rather than by conduct.
The result is a world in which most victims of political violence in the 21st century are largely invisible.
This problem is best addressed by an international force that recognizes the victims are in the same boat.
Our International Freedom Coalition unites jihad’s victims and is the logical architecture of a global resistance movement.
It can give hope and strength to people who have been fighting their battles alone.
United, we constitute a fundamental challenge to the fictitious cover-up that jihadism is just a reaction to Western provocation.
We will be joining with the movements rising across Europe against the consequences of mass unassimilated immigration, and aim to be the first coalition in generations built around the actual victims rather than who is permitted to matter.
On July 23, we are bringing representatives of many of these peoples to a congressional briefing.
We will work to persuade the United States and its Western allies to partner with this effort, to name global jihadism outright and expose the danger it represents to millions.
We will be calling on policymakers to redirect funds toward and to protect the persecuted communities that have been so ignored.
In the months ahead, we will be calling for a summit of the persecuted and pressing the public and their representatives to grant them the standing that the major human rights institutions have withheld.
Stay tuned.
Charles Jacobs and Dr.
Walid Phares are president and vice president of the International Freedom Coalition, based in Boston.
Speakers
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.