Topic summary
57% 663 analyzed articles/videos 292,661 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Relations results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 172,523 hits . Analysis detected 1,544,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,636,048 analyzed words across 661 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,068 of 16,559 topics). This International Relations is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. International Relations
Topic details
Total words: 1,636,048
Article count: 661
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score661 analyzed articles1.6M analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst