Author summary
48%3 analyzed articles/videos1,652 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Averre results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,109 hits. Analysis detected 10,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,236 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,767 of 6,348 authors). This David Averre is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
David Averre
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
41%David Averre (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,236
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

41% percentile
025507510040.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.9%9.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos