Author summary
48% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,652 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Averre results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,109 hits . Analysis detected 10,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,236 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,767 of 6,348 authors). This David Averre is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group. David Averre
Author details
Total words: 11,236
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.9% 9.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst