Keyword summary
92% 11 analyzed articles/videos 4,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Obama results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 7,948 hits . Analysis detected 44,131 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,949 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (19,447 of 35,444 keywords). This Michelle Obama is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group. Michelle Obama
Keyword details
Total words: 30,949
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score11 analyzed articles30.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 25.7% 25.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst