Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Steele results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 3,085 hits . Analysis detected 15,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,743 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,118 of 6,346 authors). This Michael Steele is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group. Michael Steele
Author details
Total words: 9,743
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.6% percentile 3.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 31.7% 31.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.9% 10.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.8% 15.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.8%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 9.7%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst