Trump is trying to start a new Red Scare 63%

By Michael Steele0%

7/11/2026, 10:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 461 hits. Analysis detected 2,854 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,034 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.1% and a BS Rank of 63% (8,108 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the article peer group.

It should have been an occasion for a great patriotic speech. 
Instead, the short address said America faced “enemies from within,” casting routine political disagreements as an existential crisis of Christianity against communism and calling for the “twisted warped thinkers” of the opposition to be swept from the national scene. 
The year was 1950. 
The politician was Sen. 
Joe McCarthy. 
And the occasion was a dinner marking Abraham Lincoln’s birthday. 
That speech has become infamous for helping launch the Red Scare, long considered a stain on American history. 
But as President Donald Trump stood at Mount Rushmore on the eve of the nation’s 250th anniversary, he matched it beat for beat in remarks that preyed on his base’s religious devotion to falsely paint Democrats as communists: 
These are not mere political disagreements, like differences over taxes or regulations. 
Communism is a mortal threat to American liberty. 
 The godless communist morality states that anything is justified to bring about inhuman visions. 
 They don’t want good, they don’t love God, and they don’t want God. 
Trump’s speech comes at a very different time than McCarthy’s, however. 
The West won the Cold War decades ago; the remaining communist countries, such as China and Vietnam, have mixed economies, and even Cuba has adopted some market reforms. 
The “communists” Trump is attacking are democratic socialists who want to do things like expand Medicare and start city-run grocery stores in needy areas, not seize the means of production. 
The times are also different. 
The month before McCarthy delivered that 1950 speech, personal income was $6.5 billion higher than the year before. 
The prior decade saw homeownership grow by a staggering 55%, according to the 1950 Census . 
The ensuing decade would see the median wage grow by 62%. 
Play 
Trump pegs Democrats as communists in speeches 
July 6, 2026 / 10:48 
Americans within the sound of McCarthy’s voice that night in Wheeling had a reason to be optimistic about their economic futures and to see capitalism as a system worth protecting. 
The senator preyed on that vigilance. 
Trump doesn’t have that luxury of optimism. 
A YouGov poll from late last month found that 71% of Americans rate the economy as “fair” or “poor.” 
A Gallup poll from this past April found only that 25% of non-homeowners expect to buy a home in the next five years, and 67% said it was a bad time to buy a home  even as Trump still hasn’t signed a bipartisan housing reform bill overwhelmingly passed by Congress. 
That shouldn’t come as a surprise, because time and time again, Trump has blocked Congress from making Americans’ lives easier. 
Instead, he’s attempted to strong-arm the economy like it’s a Republican incumbent seeking his endorsement , using the same government intervention that his party  my party  once stood against. 
In fact, if anyone is trying to create a government-run economy, it’s not the democratic socialists; it’s Trump himself. 
The president has imposed illegal tariffs and is now subsidizing farmers suffering under those tariffs to the tune of $44 billion by the end of this year. 
He spearheaded partial state ownership of private companies. 
As recently as this week, the administration even announced so-called  Freedom Fuel  centers to offset uncertainty at the pump caused by Trump’s war with Iran, which he entered without congressional approval. 
All the while, Trump has not only insulated his own riches from the disastrous economic policies he’s implemented, but he’s multiplied them . 
Even more sinister, the president has embraced the same authoritarian tactics associated with actual communist leaders. 
Since Day One of his second term, his administration has worked overtime to purge the federal workforce of anyone he suspects of disloyalty. 
His Homeland Security Department has detained people for writing op-eds and flooded cities with masked federal agents. 
His Justice Department has targeted perceived enemies with the full might of the U.S. criminal justice system. 
The communists didn’t do it. 
He did; and that’s exactly why Trump won’t be able to sell a new Red Scare any better than he was able to sell red meat . 
Play 
Trump promotes ‘Freedom Fuel’ as gas prices climb from Iran war 
July 9, 2026 / 05:52 
It’s not just because fearmongering about communism only reminds Americans that the man is 80 years old and mentored by the biggest architect of McCarthyism , Roy Cohn. 
It’s not just because half of Americans weren’t even alive when the Soviet Union was still an existential threat to the United States. 
It’s because they’re fed up with politicians performing one moral code in public while living a diametrically opposite one in private. 
They’re tired of a politics that says it’s communist to feed the poor and Christian to starve them . 
They’re sick of confronting a real red scare every time they check their bank balance while an octogenarian yelling about communism gets billions of dollars richer. 
America deserves a debate about the proper role of government in a free society. 
We deserve an honest discussion about capitalism, markets, regulation, public investment and individual liberty. 
Those conversations become impossible when every dissenting voice is derided as a communist. 
History is complicated. 
Political philosophy is nuanced. 
Reasonable people can and likely will disagree. 
But democracy is strengthened when our leaders negotiate those differences rather than exploiting them. 
That night in Wheeling, McCarthy did say one thing that holds up now, though probably not the way he intended: 
It has not been the less fortunate or members of minority groups who have been selling this Nation out, but rather those who have had all the benefits that the wealthiest nation on earth has had to offer  the finest homes, the finest college education, and the finest jobs in Government we can give. 
For a living example of that, stop by 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. 
Look for the man in the red hat. 
For more thought-provoking insights from Michael Steele, Symone Sanders Townsend and Luke Russert, watch “The Weeknight” every Monday-Friday at 7 p.m. 
ET on MS NOW. 
The post Trump is trying to start a new Red Scare appeared first on MS NOW . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.3%Michael Steele: 7.6%MS NOW: 7.5%Confirmation Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 1.1%MS NOW: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%Michael Steele: 2.0%MS NOW: 3.7%Availability Heuristic10.1%This article: 4.3%Michael Steele: 1.1%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 1.9%Michael Steele: 0.9%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 4.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Michael Steele: 7.2%MS NOW: 15.4%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.3%MS NOW: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Michael Steele: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect1.7%This article: 2.9%Michael Steele: 1.2%MS NOW: 2.4%Optimism Bias2.9%This article: 3.3%Michael Steele: 1.7%MS NOW: 3.2%Pessimism Bias3.3%This article: 44.6%Michael Steele: 10.9%MS NOW: 19.2%Negativity Bias44.6%This article: 3.0%Michael Steele: 0.6%MS NOW: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 6.5%MS NOW: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 1.5%MS NOW: 3.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%Michael Steele: 2.7%MS NOW: 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias8.2%This article: 0.8%Michael Steele: 1.4%MS NOW: 2.2%Halo Effect0.8%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 1.5%MS NOW: 1.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.7%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Michael Steele: 0.3%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect7.4%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 13.0%Michael Steele: 9.7%MS NOW: 4.7%Ad Hominem13.0%This article: 10.1%Michael Steele: 4.4%MS NOW: 1.3%Straw Man10.1%This article: 1.1%Michael Steele: 2.5%MS NOW: 5.4%Appeal to Authority1.1%This article: 3.5%Michael Steele: 4.4%MS NOW: 2.2%False Dilemma3.5%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 2.3%MS NOW: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.7%Michael Steele: 15.8%MS NOW: 8.1%Hasty Generalization19.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 1.0%MS NOW: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 23.5%Michael Steele: 4.4%MS NOW: 9.8%Appeal to Emotion23.5%This article: 8.4%Michael Steele: 4.1%MS NOW: 2.4%Begging the Question8.4%This article: 21.0%Michael Steele: 1.2%MS NOW: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)21.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.9%Michael Steele: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof4.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 1.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.1%Michael Steele: 0.5%MS NOW: 2.6%Anecdotal1.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.7%Michael Steele: 0.7%MS NOW: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.7%Michael Steele: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Steele: 0.7%MS NOW: 1.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.8%Michael Steele: 1.5%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote11.8%This article: 4.5%Michael Steele: 0.1%MS NOW: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection4.5%This article: 21.0%Michael Steele: 31.7%MS NOW: 14.2%Biased Writer Voice21.0%This article: 5.0%Michael Steele: 3.3%MS NOW: 2.1%Indoctrination5.0%This article: 14.9%Michael Steele: 14.1%MS NOW: 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias14.9%This article: 2.7%Michael Steele: 0.3%MS NOW: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.7%This article: 2.4%Michael Steele: 1.3%MS NOW: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.4%

1034 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.