Author summary
93% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Stiles results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 8,704 hits . Analysis detected 36,930 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,519 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,190 of 6,455 authors). This Andrew Stiles is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Andrew Stiles
Author details
Total words: 21,519
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.1% percentile 3.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 40.5% 40.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.4% 6.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.3% 23.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 40.5%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 12.3%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst