Author summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 6,146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Feinberg results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 6,637 hits . Analysis detected 39,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,899 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,816 of 6,170 authors). This Andrew Feinberg is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group. Andrew Feinberg
Author details
Total words: 33,899
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score9 analyzed articles33.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.6% 19.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 16.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst