Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Michele Norris results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 578 hits . Analysis detected 4,906 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Michele Norris is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Michele Norris
Author details
Total words: 5,956
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst