Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video830 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AUDREY McAVOY results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 414 hits. Analysis detected 2,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (4,956 of 6,359 authors). This AUDREY McAVOY is better (less manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
AUDREY McAVOY
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠23%AUDREY McAVOY (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,320
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

22% percentile
025507510022.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.5%12.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos