Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These OAN Staff (Sophia Flores) results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44% saturation with 233 hits . Analysis detected 1,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 530 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of 97% (225 of 6,164 authors). This OAN Staff (Sophia Flores) is worse (more manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group. OAN Staff (Sophia Flores)
Author details
Total words: 530
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.4% percentile 12.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles530 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 44.0% 44.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 32.1% 32.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 43.6% 43.6% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 12.6% 12.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 44.0%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 43.6%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 32.1%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Bandwagon: Author 8.7%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst