Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jihadism results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 3,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,243 topics). This Jihadism is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jihadism
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Jihadism (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,616
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 22.0%22.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 13.1%13.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.3%19.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.7%8.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos