Author summary
32% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claire Carter results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,144 hits . Analysis detected 8,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,527 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,375 of 6,192 authors). This Claire Carter is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group. Claire Carter
Author details
Total words: 12,527
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst