Author summary
66% 2 analyzed articles/videos 844 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jay Rogers results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 1,143 hits . Analysis detected 7,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,648 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,518 of 6,628 authors). This Jay Rogers is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Jay Rogers
Author details
Total words: 5,648
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.0% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.2% 20.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.5% 5.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst