Author summary
⁠57%2 analyzed articles/videos1,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Connor Bolster results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Straw Man, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 1,222 hits. Analysis detected 8,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,443 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (2,338 of 6,244 authors). This Connor Bolster is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Connor Bolster
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠63%Connor Bolster (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,443
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510062.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.4%12.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 19.0%19.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.7%7.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Author 9.6%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos