Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hans von Spakovsky results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 1,803 hits . Analysis detected 11,685 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,488 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,570 of 6,362 authors). This Hans von Spakovsky is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Hans von Spakovsky
Author details
Total words: 8,488
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.6% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.2% 21.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.8% 5.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.9% 5.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst