Publication summary
89% 97 analyzed articles/videos 64,893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Federalist results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 63,930 hits . Analysis detected 507,757 faulty-reasoning hits from 320,870 analyzed words across 97 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 77% (91 of 379 publications). This The Federalist is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 320,870
Article count: 97
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.2% percentile 2.9% BS Score97 analyzed articles320.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 10.2% 10.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 19.9% 19.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 19.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Publication 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 15.9%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Publication 11.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst